The story of a processing can help to understand the product when describing real activities. Communication must distinguish verified information, testimonials and aesthetic interpretation. An evocative story should not attribute to an article processes or people who have not participated in its realization.
I propose that we collect the necessary references before using the story. What processing is described? Which product is it referring to? Images must maintain an understandable relationship with the text. A representative photograph may be useful, as long as it does not suggest a non-existent link.
In a hypothetical example, one detail is made manually while other stages follow different processes. Explaining the detail allows you to enhance it without presenting the entire product as a result of the same method. Precision makes the actual contribution of processing more legible.
The review should involve those who know the process and verify the final version of the product. The story gains value when it helps the customer recognize something they can observe. Accurate communication preserves the interest of history and makes it consistent with what is actually being sold.