A territorial opportunity can involve multiple members and different interests. Before we discuss who should do it, we need to understand what problem you face and what conditions make sustainability plausible. The debate on the recipient should not replace the analysis of the project.
I propose that we consider local demand, necessary resources, skills and relationships with existing activities. Trade assumptions must be recognizable as estimates, separating observed data and expectations. Logistics and organizational costs for the network can also be significant.
Comparison between proposals requires relevant criteria and sufficiently homogeneous information. Constantly changing the parameters makes it difficult to understand the outcome. The legal and contractual rules applicable to the individual opportunity must be verified separately.
A summary of the decision may explain considered alternatives, required conditions and reasons for preference, while respecting confidentiality. This article proposes a method of evaluation and does not reconstruct real assignments. The purpose is to allow members to understand how the project contributes to the network and what elements can be verified after its realization, linking initial choice and actual results.