A common decision can be clear at the time of adoption and lose continuity during implementation. The necessary activities can involve offices, suppliers and members. Following the path allows to distinguish delays, new obstacles and really achieved results.
I propose to translate the choice into understandable passages, with proportionate moments of verification. Responsibilities must follow actual skills. Too detailed a schedule can become difficult to maintain; few steps related to observable results make communication more useful to members.
Let's think of a new delivery booking system. The availability of the tool is a first step; its correct use requires instruction and assistance. Declaring implementation ended at the time of installation could leave out the most relevant part for users.
Restitution should explain what works and what still requires work. Verification is about the result of the choice, without confusing an execution problem with a change in the goal. This makes the use of common resources more understandable and helps to correct the path.