A brand that sells to retailers must understand both the needs of the store and those of the end customer. The dealer's order describes an assortment choice; the next sale describes a market response. Confusing the two moments can make reading the collection incomplete.
I propose that we collect separate information, according to actual reports and availability. The store can report requests, missing sizes, and difficulty explaining. The trademark must avoid interpreting each initial order as evidence of an already verified use by consumers.
Let's imagine a very appreciated line during the presentation, but complex to describe in the store. The problem may concern the information material or the matching proposal. The comparison with the dealer allows you to recognize an obstacle that orders alone do not show.
The revision should link initial choice and subsequent feedback, keeping visible context and data limits. The business relationship gains value when it fosters an understanding of the full path. Each party can thus discuss the work needed to make the collection actually usable and sellable.