A student simulates an interview and receives useful questions. I propose to compare the exercise with the real purpose and also ask for human feedback.
In the example, the system helps organize responses, but does not know the criteria and context of the future interlocutor. The simulation can prepare, not guarantee the outcome.
It is useful to keep room for unforeseen questions and personal explanations. Training does not mean memorizing a rigid performance: it means building resources to adapt during a real conversation.