An assisted document contains an unadopted proposal and the client asks why. I propose an explanation centered on relevant facts and criteria.

In the example, a formula is rejected because it does not match the agreements. Control becomes visible through understandable reasons.

You don't have to perform the whole conversation with the system. It is necessary to show that the final version has been chosen and verified, avoiding to present the correction as a personal preference without connection to the requested service.

Background sources