A student sees a mistake but is afraid to change a seemingly authoritative answer. I propose that we use the system as material open to review.
In the example, correction arises from comparison with a source and is noted. You don't need to prove you're smarter than the program.
It is necessary to maintain control over the information adopted. The ability to intervene, reject or interrupt an output is part of the competent use, especially when the result will be read by people who have not seen the conversation.